cholorambucil versus cholorambucil plus prednisolone as first-line therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in west of iran

نویسندگان

mehrdad payandeh 1. pennathur a, gibson mk, jobe ba, luketich jd. oesophageal carcinoma.lancet. 2013;381(9864):400-12. 2. ferlay j, shin hr, bray f, forman d, mathers c, parkin dm.estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: globocan 2008. int j cancer. 2010;127:2893–917. 3. lepage c, rachet b, jooste v, faivre j, coleman mp. continuing rapid increase in sophageal adenocarcinoma in england and wales. am j gastroentero.l 2008;103 2694–99. 4. pennathur a, farkas a, krasinskas am. esophagectomy for t1 esophageal cancer: outcomes in 100 patients and implications for endoscopic therapy. ann thorac surg. 2009;87:1048–55. 5. mir mr, rajabpour mv, delarestaghi mm, hadji m, harirchi i, mir p, mir a, lashkari m, zendehdel k. short- and long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients treated at the cancer institute of iran. dig surg. 2013;30(4-6):331-6. 6. harirchi i, kolahdoozan s, hajizadeh s, safari f, sedighi z, nahvijou a, mir mr, mousavi sm, zendehdel k. esophageal cancer in iran; a population-based study regarding adequacy of cancer surgery and overall survival. eur j surg oncol. 2014;40(3):352-7. 7. pennathur a, luketich jd. resection for esophageal cancer:strategies for optimal management. ann thorac surg. 2008;85:751–56. 8. pennathur a, zhang j, chen h, luketich jd. the “best operation”for esophageal cancer? ann thorac surg. 2010;89:2163–67. 9. davies ar, forshaw mj, khan aa, noorani as, patel vm, strauss dc, mason rc. transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution. world j surg oncol. 2008 ;6:88. 10. chang ac, ji h, birkmeyer nj, orringer mb, birkmeyer jd. outcomes after transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. ann thorac surg. 2008;85(2):424-9. 11. nikbakhsh n, amri p, shakeri a, shakeri a. changes in blood pressure and heart rhythm during transhiatal esophagectomy.caspian j intern med. 2012;3(4):541-5. 12. mallipeddi mk, onaitis mw. the contemporary role of minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer. curr oncol rep. 2014;16(3):374. 13. sundaram a, geronimo jc, willer bl, hoshino m, torgersen z, juhasz a, lee th, mittal sk. survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience. surg endosc. 2012;26(1):168-76. 14. herbella fa, patti mg. minimally invasive esophagectomy. world j gastroenterol. 2010;16(30):3811-5. 15. rice tw, blackstone eh, rusch vw. 7th edition of the ajcc cancer staging manual: esophagus and esophagogastric junction.ann surg oncol. 2010;17(7):1721-4 16. d'journo xb, thomas pa. current management of esophageal cancer. j thorac dis. 2014;6 suppl 2:s253-64. 17.hoppo t, jobe ba, hunter jg. minimally invasive esophagectomy: the evolution and technique of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer. world j surg. 2011;35(7):1454-63. 18. dhamija a, dhamija a, hancock j, mccloskey b, kim aw, detterbeck fc, boffa dj. minimally invasive oesophagectomy more expensive than open despite shorter length of stay. eur j cardiothorac surg. 2014;45(5):904-9. 19. galvani ca, gorodner mv, moser f, jacobsen g, chretien c, espat nj, donahue p, horgan s. robotically assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. surg endosc. 2008;22(1):188-95. 20. nguyen nt, hinojosa mw, smith br, chang kj, gray j, hoyt d. minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. ann surg. 2008;248(6):1081-91. 21. dunn dh, johnson em, morphew ja, dilworth hp, krueger jl, banerji n. robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience. dis esophagus. 2013;26(2):159-66. 22. maas kw, biere ss, scheepers jj, gisbertz ss, van-der-peet dl, cuesta ma. laparoscopic versus open transhiatal esophagectomy for distal and junction cancer. rev esp enferm dig. 2012;104(4):197-202. 23. rizvi fh, rizvi ss, syed aa, khattak s, khan ar. minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: the first experience from pakistan. int j surg oncol. 2014;2014:864705. 24. tabatabaie sa., hashemi sm,, mohajeri gh,ahmadinejad m, goharian v, kolahdoozan m.,sehhat s, davarpanah ah. incidence of hypotension and type of arrhythmia in transhiatal esophagectomy and evaluation of related factors.iranian journal of surgery. 2009;16(4):59-68. dept. of hematology and medical oncology, kermanshah university of medical sciences, kermanshah, iran

masoud sadeghi students research committee, kermanshah university of medical sciences, kermanshah, iran medical biology research center, kermanshah university of medical sciences, kermanshah, iran

edris sadeghi students research committee, kermanshah university of medical sciences, kermanshah, iran medical biology research center, kermanshah university of medical sciences, kermanshah, iran

چکیده

1. dept. of hematology and medical oncology, kermanshah university of medical sciences, kermanshah, iran 2. students research committee, kermanshah university of medical sciences, kermanshah, iran 3. medical biology research center, kermanshah university of medical sciences, kermanshah, iran                                     corresponding author: masoud sadeghi, msc. tel: (+98) 9185960644 email: [email protected] received: 03 aug. 2014 accepted: 07 feb. 2015  iran j cancer prev. 2015; 2:94-9.     abstract background: chronic lymphocytic leukemia (cll) has been the most common type of leukemia in adults worldwide, and then more common in the elderly, markedly more common in patients over the age of 65 years. methods: seventy patients with cll have referred to clinic of hematology-oncology, kermanshah, iran, between jan 2000 and jun 2014. we have analyzed age, sex, survival, kind of chemotherapy and type of response in all of the patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. survival curves of complete response patients have compared with partial response, by log-rank test using the prism 5 graphpad software for the five-year period with two years follow up. results: the mean age of patients was 61.57±8.88 years that 55.7% were males. between the 70 patients, 40 patients (57.1%) have started treatment with chlorambucil and 30 patients (42.9%) with chlorambucil plus prednisolone. among the forty patients that have treated with chlorambucil, overall response rate was 95% that 9 patients (22.5%) had complete response . among the 30 patients that have treated with chlorambucil plus prednisolone, overall response rate was 96%, that 9 patients (30%) had complete response after six months of treatment. the mean of five-year overall survival for treated patients with chlorambucil and chlorambucil plus prednisolone in the first-line of therapy was 38.5 and 40.5 months, respectively. conclusion: combination of prednisolon to chlorambucil has increased survival rate in the patients more than mono-therapy with chlorambucil and also the complete response rate to chlorambucil in west of iran was better than other areas of world.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Cholorambucil versus Cholorambucil Plus Prednisolone as First-Line Therapy of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in West of Iran

BACKGROUND Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been the most common type of leukemia in adults worldwide, and then more common in the elderly, markedly more common in patients over the age of 65 years. METHODS Seventy patients with CLL have referred to Clinic of Hematology-Oncology, Kermanshah, Iran, between Jan 2000 and Jun 2014. We have analyzed age, sex, survival, kind of chemotherapy a...

متن کامل

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): first-line treatment.

For the past ten years, there has been a dynamic development of new therapeutic compounds and prognostic parameters for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Hematologists and oncologists are challenged to use these new possibilities for an optimized, risk- and fitness-adapted treatment strategy, with the goal of achieving long-term remissions and preserving a good quality of life. This review is...

متن کامل

Cost-Effectiveness of Ofatumumab Plus Chlorambucil in First Line Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Canada.

Table 1. Drug Acquisition, Administration, and Monitoring Costs for FirstLine Treatment With OChl and Chl Cost Type OChl Chl Drug acquisition Ofatumumab, 100 mg vial $336 – Chlorambucil, 25 x 2 mg pack $35 $35 Administration Induction infusion in first cycle (O) $1,039 – Regular infusion in subsequent cycles (O) $818 – Oral chemotherapy dispensing (Chl)a $9 $9 Monitoring (per chemo cycle)b $119...

متن کامل

Front-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

BACKGROUND Historically, alkylator-based therapy has been used to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). More effective therapies, such as the use of monoclonal antibodies in combination with chemotherapy, have been shown to prolong both progression-free survival and overall survival. Improvements in the identification of prognostic markers for CLL, as well as novel combination...

متن کامل

First-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: role of alemtuzumab

The CD52-targeting antibody alemtuzumab is established in clinical practice with convincing activity in relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), particularly in patients with high-risk features and adverse prognosis. In the CAM307 study alemtuzumab was tested and finally approved as a first-line single agent, even though the hurdle with chlorambucil as the contender was not s...

متن کامل

The role of microRNA in acute/chronic, myeloid/lymphocytic leukemia

MicroRNAs are small, non-coding sequences that regulate gene expression by inducing degradation or translational inhibition of target mRNAs. These molecules control many intracellular physiological and pathological processes.Abnormal expression of these moleculs has been described in different cancers including hematopoietic cancers. According to the type of cancer and the stage, miRNA’s expres...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
iranian journal of cancer prevention

جلد ۸، شماره ۲، صفحات ۹۴-۹۹

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023